Legal consciousness as a factor promoting the achievement of educational objectives and the realization of the right to education by individuals and collectives
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.20952/revtee.v13i32.14690Palavras-chave:
jurisprudence, legal consciousness, educational sphere, participants to educational activities, methodological approach, legal scholar, legal theory, legal practice.Resumo
The article studies the legal consciousness of participants to educational activities in the process of achieving educational objectives and realizing their right to education. Obstacles that are typical of such a type of research conditioned by an insufficient theoretical basis for studying legal consciousness in general and as a category accompanying the realization of goals, capabilities and rights of participants to educational activities. In the Russian legal science, these obstacles are caused by the prevalence of ideological dogmas over objective scientific approaches (for example, the concept that state and law will wither away as unnecessary institutes alongside the formation of communism), which is emphasized by Russian scholars concerned with these issues. Over time, the above-mentioned difficulties have been overcome and today the issues associated with legal consciousness (in particular, individuals and collectives in the educational sphere) are an integral part of scientific interests in the field of jurisprudence. The article aims at reviewing and analyzing the process of studying legal issues (including participants to educational activities) by Russian and foreign scholars, summarizing the results of their scientific research and drawing the relevant conclusions. Relying on the existing theoretical and practical experience and an extensive set of different research methods (general scientific and specific legal methods), the authors have achieved certain results and reached several conclusions. Their main achievement is new data on various aspects of justice.
Downloads
Não há dados estatísticos.
Referências
Bainiyazov, R.S. (2006). Pravosoznanie i pravovoi mentalitet v Rossii [Legal consciousness and legal mindset in Russia]: thesis for a Doctor's Degree in Law Sciences. Saratov: Saratov Law Institute of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of the Russian Federation.
Beand, K. (2002). Internet addiction: Current status and implications for employees. Employment Counseling, 39(1), 2-11.
Berg, K., Vidmtir, N. (1975). Authoritarianism and recall of evidence about criminal behavior. Journal of Research in Personality, 9, 147-157.
Bray, R.M., Noble, A.M. (1978). Authoritarianism and decisions of mock juries; evidence of jury bias and group polarization. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 36, 1424-1430.
Bredneva, V.S. (2019). Deformatsiya professionalnogo pravosoznaniya yuristov i tekhnologii ee preodoleniya [Deforming the professional legal consciousness of jurists and ways to overcome it]. Yuzhno-Sakhalinsk: SakhGU.
Brodskii, S.L., O'Neal, H. (1983). Smitherman. Handbook of scales for research in crime and delinquency. New York: Springer.
Burbules, N.C., Torres, C.A. (2000). Globalization and Education: Critical Perspectives. New York: Routledge.
Campen, A. (1992). The First Information War: The Story of Communications, Computers, and Intelligence Systems in the Persian Gulf War. New York: Afcea Intl Pr.
Chairow, R.P., Charrow, V.R. (1979). Making legal language understandable. Colombia Law Review, 79, 1306-1374.
Cohn, E.S., While, S.O. (1990). Legal socialization: A Study of Norms and Rules. New York: Springer-Verlag.
Davis, J.A. (1990). Attitudes toward free speech in six countries in the mid-1980s: Australia, Austria, Great Britain, Italy, the United States and West Germany. European Sociological Review, 6, 1-14.
Dias, A. F., & Menezes, C. A. A. (2017). Que inovação pedagógica a pedagogia queer propõe ao currículo escolar?. Revista Tempos E Espaços Em Educação, 10(23), 37-48.
Dneprov, E.D. (2017). Rossiiskoe zakonodatelstvo ob obrazovanii XIX – nachala XX veka [The Russian laws on education of the 19th and early 20th centuries]: collection of documents. Moscow: Higher School of Economics Publishing House.
Elwork, A., Sales, B.D., Alfmi, J.J. (1982). Making jury instructions understandable. Charlottesville: Michie.
Ewick, P. (2006). Consciousness and Ideology. Aldershot: Routledge.
Farber, I.E. (1963). Pravosoznanie kak forma obshchestvennogo soznaniya [Legal consciousness as a form of social consciousness]. Moscow: Yuridicheskaya literatura.
Gervey, B.M., Chin, C.-Y., Hong, Y.-Y., Dweck, C.S. (1999). Differential use of personal information in decisions about guilt versus innocence; the role of implicit theories. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 25, 17-27.
Gibbons, M. (1998). A Commonwealth Perspective on the Globalization of Higher Education. In: P. Scott (ed.) The Globalization of Higher Education (pp. 70-87). Buckingham: The Society for Research into Higher Education & Open University Press.
Gilligan, C. (1982). In a different voice: psychological theory and women's development. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Greene, E., Bornstein, B.H. (2000). Precious little guidance: jury instruction on damage awards. Psychology, Public Policy and Law, 6(3), 743-768.
Greene, J. D. (2003). From Neutral 'is' to Moral 'ought': What are the Moral Implications of Neuroscientific Moral Psychology? Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 4, 846-849.
Greene, J.D., Sommerville, R.B., Nystrom, L.E., Darley, J.M., Cohen, J.D. (2001). A fMRI investigation of emotional engagement in moral judgment. Science, 293, 2105-2108.
Habermas, J. (1966). Postscript to Between Facts and Norms. In: M. Deflem (ed.) Habermas, modernity and law. London: SAGE.
Habermas, J. (1984). Les aventures de la rasion, Monde.
Habermas, J. (1985). Questions and Counter questions. In: R.J. Bernstein (ed.) Habermas and Modernity. Cambridge: MIT Press.
Horowitz, L.A. (1997). Reasonable doubt instructions: commonsense justice and standard of proof. Psychology, Public Policy and Law, 3, 285-302.
Ihering, R. (1991). Borba za pravo [The struggle for law]. Moscow: Fenix.
Kahneman, D.A. (2003). Perspective on judgment and choice: mapping bounded rationality. American Psychologist, 58(9), 697-720.
Kenrick, D.T., Neuberg, S.L., Cialdini, R.B. (2004). Social Psychology: Unraveling the Mystery. Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
Kohlbeck, L., Levine, C., Hewer, A. (1983). Moral Stages. Basel: Karger.
Kohlberg, L. (1958). The development of modes of moral thinking and choice in the years 10 to 16. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. Chicago: University of Chicago.
Kohlberg, L. (1969). Stage and Sequence: The Cognitive-Developmental Approach to Socialization. In: D. Goslin (ed.) Handbook of Socialization Theory and Research (pp. 347-480). Chicago: Rand McNally.
Kohlberg, L. (1976). Moral stages and moralization: The cognitive-developmental approach. In: T. Lickona (ed.) Moral Development and Behavior: Theory, Research and Social Issues (pp. 31-53). New York: Holt, Rienhart, and Winston.
Kohlberg, L. (1984). Essays on moral development. San Francisco: Harper & Row.
Konstitutsiya (Osnovnoi Zakon) Soyuza Sovetskikh Sotsialisticheskikh Respublik [The Constitution (Basic Law) of the Union of Soviet Socialist Republics]. (1936). Moscow, USSR.
Konstitutsiya (Osnovnoi Zakon) Soyuza Sovetskikh Sotsialisticheskikh Respublik [The Constitution (Basic Law) of the Union of Soviet Socialist Republics]. (1977). Moscow, USSR.
Konstitutsiya Rossiiskoi Federatsii [The Constitution of the Russian Federation]. (1993). Moscow, Russia.
Korotkova, O.I. (2010). Teoretiko-pravovoi analiz pravosoznaniya kak neobkhodimyi kompo-nent provedeniya politiko-pravovykh reform [The theoretical and legal analysis of legal consciousness as the necessary component of political and legal reforms]. Gosudarstvennaya vlast i mestnoe samo-upravlenie, 11, 5-10.
Kourilsky-Augeven, C. (2007). Legal Socialization: From Compliance to Familiarization through Permeation. European Journal of Legal Studies, 1, 265-295.
Kovacs, H., & Tinoca, L. (2017). Unfreeze the pedagogies: introduction of a new innovative measure in Portugal. Revista Tempos E Espaços Em Educação, 10(23), 73-86.
Krauss, D.A., Sales, B.D. (2001). The effects of clinical and scientific expert testimony on juror decision making in capital sentencing. Psychology, Public Policy and Law, 7, 267-310.
Lapaeva, V.V. (1999). Sotsiologiya prava kak yuridicheskaya distsiplina? [The sociology of law as a legal discipline]. Sotsiologicheskie issledovaniya, 7, 47-57.
Leshchenko, O.V. (2015). Teoretiko-pravovye podkhody k ponimaniyu sushchnosti pravovogo soznaniya [Theoretical and legal approaches to understanding the essence of legal consciousness]. Vestnik KGU im. N.A. Nekrasova, 21(3), 174-178.
Luhmann, N. (1995). Das Rechtder Gesellschaft. Frankfurt a. M.: Suhrkamp.
Luhmann, N. (1999). Ausdifferenzierungdes Rechts Beiträgezur Rechtssoziologie und Rechtstheorie. Frankfurt a. M.: Suhrkamp.
Marx, K., Engels, F. (1955). Nemetskaya ideologiya [The German ideology]. Moscow: Gospolitizdat.
Migushchenko, O.N. (2006). Istoricheskoe i logicheskoe v ponimanii pravosoznaniya [The historical and logical components of understanding legal consciousness]. Istoriya gosudarstva i prava, 9, pp. 24-26.
Montague, P.R., King-Casas, B., Cohen, J.D. (2006). Imaging Valuation Models in Human Choice. Annual Review of Neuroscience, 29, 417-448.
Moscovici, S. (1981). On social representations. Perspectives on everyday understanding. In: J. Forgas (ed.) Social Cognition (pp. 181-209). London: Academic Press.
Moscovici, S. (1993). Introductory Address. Papers on social representations, 2(3), 160-170.
Moscovici, S. (1998). The history and actuality of social representations. In: U. Flick (ed.) The psychology of the social. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Nier, J.A., Mottola, G.R., Gaertner, S.L. (2000). O.J. Simpson's criminal verdict as a racially symbolic event: a longitudinal analysis of racial altitude change. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 26, 507-516.
Ostroumov, G.S. (1969). Pravovoe osoznanie deistvitelnosti [The legal consciousness of reality]. Moscow: Nauka.
Pastushenya, A.N. (1998). Kriminogennaya sushchnost lichnosti prestupnika: metodologiya po-znaniya i psikhologicheskaya kontseptsiya [The criminogenic nature of a criminal: cognitive methods and psychological concepts]. Minsk: Academy of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of the Republic of Belarus.
Pastushenya, A.N. (2012). Psikhologicheskaya kharakteristika individualnogo i obshchestvennogo pravosoznaniya: strukturno-soderzhatelnyi aspekt [Psychological characteristics of individual and common legal consciousness: structural and substantial aspects]. Psikhologiya i pravo, 1, 132-142.
Petrazhitskii, L.I. (1910). Teoriya prava i gosudarstva v svyazi s teoriei nravstvennosti [The theory of law and state in connection with the theory of morality]. Saint Petersburg: Tipografiya M. Merkusheva.
Pevtsova, E.A. (2004). Novaya teoriya pravosoznaniya kak osnova effektivnogo primeneniya prava i preobrazovaniya pravovoi kultury Rossii [A new theory of legal consciousness as the basis of effective law enforcement and transformation of the Russian legal culture]. The proceedings of the 2nd International congress of legal scholars "The innovative development of legal environment", April 25-26. Moscow, Russia.
Safronov, V.V. (2004). Pravosoznanie grazhdanina [The legal consciousness of citizens]: thesis for a Doctor's Degree in Law Sciences. Krasnoyarsk: Krasnoyarsk State University.
Shapira, N. (2000). Psychiatric features of individuals with problematic Internet use. Journal of Affective Disorders, 57, 267-272.
Sousa, J. M. (2016). Repensar o Currículo como Emancipador. Revista Tempos E Espaços Em Educação, 9(18), 111-120.
Sheeran, P., Abraham, C. (2003). Mediator of Moderators: Temporal Stability of Intention and the Intention-Behavior Relation. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 29, 205-215.
Silbey, S.S. (2005). After Legal Consciousness. Annual Review of Law and Social Science, 1, 323-368.
Stromquist, N.P., Monkman, K. (2000). Defining Globalization and Assessing Its Implications on Knowledge and Education. In: N.P. Stromquist, K. Monkman (eds.) Globalization and Education (pp. 3-25). Lanham - New York: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers, Inc.
Summers, S.R., Kassin, S.M. (2001). On many impacts of inadmissible testimony: selective compliance, need for cognition, and the overcorrection bias. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 27, 1368-1377.
Sutton, S. (2002). Testing attitude-behavior theories using non-experimental data: an examination of some hidden assumptions. European Review of Social Psychology, 13, 293-323.
Tapp, J.L. (1991). The geography of legal socialization: scientific and social markers. Droit et Societe, 19, 329-353.
Tapp, J.L., Kohlberg, L. (1971). Developing senses of law and legal justice, The Journal of Social Issues, 27, 65-92.
Tapp, J.L., Levine, F.J. (1977a). The dialectic of legal socialization in community and school. In: J. L. Tapp, F. J. Levine (eds.) Law, Justice, and the Individual in Society: Psychological and Legal Issues (pp. 163-182). New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
Tapp, J.L., Levine, F.J. (1977b). Law, Justice and the Individual in Society: Psychological and Legal Issues. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
Thurstone, L.L. (1927). The Method of Paired Comparisons for Social Values. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 21, 384-400.
Turner, J. (2004). Human emotions: A sociological theory. London: Taylor & Francis.
Vizirenko, E.V. (2015). Tendentsii razvitiya pravosoznaniya i pravovoi kultury v sovre-mennom rossiiskom obshchestve [Trends in developing legal consciousness and legal culture in the modern Russian society]. Mezhdunarodnyi nauchno-issledovatelskii zhurnal, 6-2(37), 89-91.
Wegener, D.Т., Fleming, M.A., Kerr, N.L., Petty, R.E. (2000). Flexible correction of juror judgments: implications for jury instructions. Psychology, Public Policy and Law, 6(3), 629-654.
Yurashevich, N.M. (2004). Evolyutsiya ponyatiya pravovogo soznaniya [Evolving the concept of legal consciousness]. Pravovedenie, 2, 165-181.
Zellman, G.L., Sears, D.O. (1971). Childhood origins of tolerance for dissent. Social Issues, 27, 109-136.
Beand, K. (2002). Internet addiction: Current status and implications for employees. Employment Counseling, 39(1), 2-11.
Berg, K., Vidmtir, N. (1975). Authoritarianism and recall of evidence about criminal behavior. Journal of Research in Personality, 9, 147-157.
Bray, R.M., Noble, A.M. (1978). Authoritarianism and decisions of mock juries; evidence of jury bias and group polarization. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 36, 1424-1430.
Bredneva, V.S. (2019). Deformatsiya professionalnogo pravosoznaniya yuristov i tekhnologii ee preodoleniya [Deforming the professional legal consciousness of jurists and ways to overcome it]. Yuzhno-Sakhalinsk: SakhGU.
Brodskii, S.L., O'Neal, H. (1983). Smitherman. Handbook of scales for research in crime and delinquency. New York: Springer.
Burbules, N.C., Torres, C.A. (2000). Globalization and Education: Critical Perspectives. New York: Routledge.
Campen, A. (1992). The First Information War: The Story of Communications, Computers, and Intelligence Systems in the Persian Gulf War. New York: Afcea Intl Pr.
Chairow, R.P., Charrow, V.R. (1979). Making legal language understandable. Colombia Law Review, 79, 1306-1374.
Cohn, E.S., While, S.O. (1990). Legal socialization: A Study of Norms and Rules. New York: Springer-Verlag.
Davis, J.A. (1990). Attitudes toward free speech in six countries in the mid-1980s: Australia, Austria, Great Britain, Italy, the United States and West Germany. European Sociological Review, 6, 1-14.
Dias, A. F., & Menezes, C. A. A. (2017). Que inovação pedagógica a pedagogia queer propõe ao currículo escolar?. Revista Tempos E Espaços Em Educação, 10(23), 37-48.
Dneprov, E.D. (2017). Rossiiskoe zakonodatelstvo ob obrazovanii XIX – nachala XX veka [The Russian laws on education of the 19th and early 20th centuries]: collection of documents. Moscow: Higher School of Economics Publishing House.
Elwork, A., Sales, B.D., Alfmi, J.J. (1982). Making jury instructions understandable. Charlottesville: Michie.
Ewick, P. (2006). Consciousness and Ideology. Aldershot: Routledge.
Farber, I.E. (1963). Pravosoznanie kak forma obshchestvennogo soznaniya [Legal consciousness as a form of social consciousness]. Moscow: Yuridicheskaya literatura.
Gervey, B.M., Chin, C.-Y., Hong, Y.-Y., Dweck, C.S. (1999). Differential use of personal information in decisions about guilt versus innocence; the role of implicit theories. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 25, 17-27.
Gibbons, M. (1998). A Commonwealth Perspective on the Globalization of Higher Education. In: P. Scott (ed.) The Globalization of Higher Education (pp. 70-87). Buckingham: The Society for Research into Higher Education & Open University Press.
Gilligan, C. (1982). In a different voice: psychological theory and women's development. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Greene, E., Bornstein, B.H. (2000). Precious little guidance: jury instruction on damage awards. Psychology, Public Policy and Law, 6(3), 743-768.
Greene, J. D. (2003). From Neutral 'is' to Moral 'ought': What are the Moral Implications of Neuroscientific Moral Psychology? Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 4, 846-849.
Greene, J.D., Sommerville, R.B., Nystrom, L.E., Darley, J.M., Cohen, J.D. (2001). A fMRI investigation of emotional engagement in moral judgment. Science, 293, 2105-2108.
Habermas, J. (1966). Postscript to Between Facts and Norms. In: M. Deflem (ed.) Habermas, modernity and law. London: SAGE.
Habermas, J. (1984). Les aventures de la rasion, Monde.
Habermas, J. (1985). Questions and Counter questions. In: R.J. Bernstein (ed.) Habermas and Modernity. Cambridge: MIT Press.
Horowitz, L.A. (1997). Reasonable doubt instructions: commonsense justice and standard of proof. Psychology, Public Policy and Law, 3, 285-302.
Ihering, R. (1991). Borba za pravo [The struggle for law]. Moscow: Fenix.
Kahneman, D.A. (2003). Perspective on judgment and choice: mapping bounded rationality. American Psychologist, 58(9), 697-720.
Kenrick, D.T., Neuberg, S.L., Cialdini, R.B. (2004). Social Psychology: Unraveling the Mystery. Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
Kohlbeck, L., Levine, C., Hewer, A. (1983). Moral Stages. Basel: Karger.
Kohlberg, L. (1958). The development of modes of moral thinking and choice in the years 10 to 16. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. Chicago: University of Chicago.
Kohlberg, L. (1969). Stage and Sequence: The Cognitive-Developmental Approach to Socialization. In: D. Goslin (ed.) Handbook of Socialization Theory and Research (pp. 347-480). Chicago: Rand McNally.
Kohlberg, L. (1976). Moral stages and moralization: The cognitive-developmental approach. In: T. Lickona (ed.) Moral Development and Behavior: Theory, Research and Social Issues (pp. 31-53). New York: Holt, Rienhart, and Winston.
Kohlberg, L. (1984). Essays on moral development. San Francisco: Harper & Row.
Konstitutsiya (Osnovnoi Zakon) Soyuza Sovetskikh Sotsialisticheskikh Respublik [The Constitution (Basic Law) of the Union of Soviet Socialist Republics]. (1936). Moscow, USSR.
Konstitutsiya (Osnovnoi Zakon) Soyuza Sovetskikh Sotsialisticheskikh Respublik [The Constitution (Basic Law) of the Union of Soviet Socialist Republics]. (1977). Moscow, USSR.
Konstitutsiya Rossiiskoi Federatsii [The Constitution of the Russian Federation]. (1993). Moscow, Russia.
Korotkova, O.I. (2010). Teoretiko-pravovoi analiz pravosoznaniya kak neobkhodimyi kompo-nent provedeniya politiko-pravovykh reform [The theoretical and legal analysis of legal consciousness as the necessary component of political and legal reforms]. Gosudarstvennaya vlast i mestnoe samo-upravlenie, 11, 5-10.
Kourilsky-Augeven, C. (2007). Legal Socialization: From Compliance to Familiarization through Permeation. European Journal of Legal Studies, 1, 265-295.
Kovacs, H., & Tinoca, L. (2017). Unfreeze the pedagogies: introduction of a new innovative measure in Portugal. Revista Tempos E Espaços Em Educação, 10(23), 73-86.
Krauss, D.A., Sales, B.D. (2001). The effects of clinical and scientific expert testimony on juror decision making in capital sentencing. Psychology, Public Policy and Law, 7, 267-310.
Lapaeva, V.V. (1999). Sotsiologiya prava kak yuridicheskaya distsiplina? [The sociology of law as a legal discipline]. Sotsiologicheskie issledovaniya, 7, 47-57.
Leshchenko, O.V. (2015). Teoretiko-pravovye podkhody k ponimaniyu sushchnosti pravovogo soznaniya [Theoretical and legal approaches to understanding the essence of legal consciousness]. Vestnik KGU im. N.A. Nekrasova, 21(3), 174-178.
Luhmann, N. (1995). Das Rechtder Gesellschaft. Frankfurt a. M.: Suhrkamp.
Luhmann, N. (1999). Ausdifferenzierungdes Rechts Beiträgezur Rechtssoziologie und Rechtstheorie. Frankfurt a. M.: Suhrkamp.
Marx, K., Engels, F. (1955). Nemetskaya ideologiya [The German ideology]. Moscow: Gospolitizdat.
Migushchenko, O.N. (2006). Istoricheskoe i logicheskoe v ponimanii pravosoznaniya [The historical and logical components of understanding legal consciousness]. Istoriya gosudarstva i prava, 9, pp. 24-26.
Montague, P.R., King-Casas, B., Cohen, J.D. (2006). Imaging Valuation Models in Human Choice. Annual Review of Neuroscience, 29, 417-448.
Moscovici, S. (1981). On social representations. Perspectives on everyday understanding. In: J. Forgas (ed.) Social Cognition (pp. 181-209). London: Academic Press.
Moscovici, S. (1993). Introductory Address. Papers on social representations, 2(3), 160-170.
Moscovici, S. (1998). The history and actuality of social representations. In: U. Flick (ed.) The psychology of the social. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Nier, J.A., Mottola, G.R., Gaertner, S.L. (2000). O.J. Simpson's criminal verdict as a racially symbolic event: a longitudinal analysis of racial altitude change. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 26, 507-516.
Ostroumov, G.S. (1969). Pravovoe osoznanie deistvitelnosti [The legal consciousness of reality]. Moscow: Nauka.
Pastushenya, A.N. (1998). Kriminogennaya sushchnost lichnosti prestupnika: metodologiya po-znaniya i psikhologicheskaya kontseptsiya [The criminogenic nature of a criminal: cognitive methods and psychological concepts]. Minsk: Academy of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of the Republic of Belarus.
Pastushenya, A.N. (2012). Psikhologicheskaya kharakteristika individualnogo i obshchestvennogo pravosoznaniya: strukturno-soderzhatelnyi aspekt [Psychological characteristics of individual and common legal consciousness: structural and substantial aspects]. Psikhologiya i pravo, 1, 132-142.
Petrazhitskii, L.I. (1910). Teoriya prava i gosudarstva v svyazi s teoriei nravstvennosti [The theory of law and state in connection with the theory of morality]. Saint Petersburg: Tipografiya M. Merkusheva.
Pevtsova, E.A. (2004). Novaya teoriya pravosoznaniya kak osnova effektivnogo primeneniya prava i preobrazovaniya pravovoi kultury Rossii [A new theory of legal consciousness as the basis of effective law enforcement and transformation of the Russian legal culture]. The proceedings of the 2nd International congress of legal scholars "The innovative development of legal environment", April 25-26. Moscow, Russia.
Safronov, V.V. (2004). Pravosoznanie grazhdanina [The legal consciousness of citizens]: thesis for a Doctor's Degree in Law Sciences. Krasnoyarsk: Krasnoyarsk State University.
Shapira, N. (2000). Psychiatric features of individuals with problematic Internet use. Journal of Affective Disorders, 57, 267-272.
Sousa, J. M. (2016). Repensar o Currículo como Emancipador. Revista Tempos E Espaços Em Educação, 9(18), 111-120.
Sheeran, P., Abraham, C. (2003). Mediator of Moderators: Temporal Stability of Intention and the Intention-Behavior Relation. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 29, 205-215.
Silbey, S.S. (2005). After Legal Consciousness. Annual Review of Law and Social Science, 1, 323-368.
Stromquist, N.P., Monkman, K. (2000). Defining Globalization and Assessing Its Implications on Knowledge and Education. In: N.P. Stromquist, K. Monkman (eds.) Globalization and Education (pp. 3-25). Lanham - New York: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers, Inc.
Summers, S.R., Kassin, S.M. (2001). On many impacts of inadmissible testimony: selective compliance, need for cognition, and the overcorrection bias. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 27, 1368-1377.
Sutton, S. (2002). Testing attitude-behavior theories using non-experimental data: an examination of some hidden assumptions. European Review of Social Psychology, 13, 293-323.
Tapp, J.L. (1991). The geography of legal socialization: scientific and social markers. Droit et Societe, 19, 329-353.
Tapp, J.L., Kohlberg, L. (1971). Developing senses of law and legal justice, The Journal of Social Issues, 27, 65-92.
Tapp, J.L., Levine, F.J. (1977a). The dialectic of legal socialization in community and school. In: J. L. Tapp, F. J. Levine (eds.) Law, Justice, and the Individual in Society: Psychological and Legal Issues (pp. 163-182). New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
Tapp, J.L., Levine, F.J. (1977b). Law, Justice and the Individual in Society: Psychological and Legal Issues. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
Thurstone, L.L. (1927). The Method of Paired Comparisons for Social Values. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 21, 384-400.
Turner, J. (2004). Human emotions: A sociological theory. London: Taylor & Francis.
Vizirenko, E.V. (2015). Tendentsii razvitiya pravosoznaniya i pravovoi kultury v sovre-mennom rossiiskom obshchestve [Trends in developing legal consciousness and legal culture in the modern Russian society]. Mezhdunarodnyi nauchno-issledovatelskii zhurnal, 6-2(37), 89-91.
Wegener, D.Т., Fleming, M.A., Kerr, N.L., Petty, R.E. (2000). Flexible correction of juror judgments: implications for jury instructions. Psychology, Public Policy and Law, 6(3), 629-654.
Yurashevich, N.M. (2004). Evolyutsiya ponyatiya pravovogo soznaniya [Evolving the concept of legal consciousness]. Pravovedenie, 2, 165-181.
Zellman, G.L., Sears, D.O. (1971). Childhood origins of tolerance for dissent. Social Issues, 27, 109-136.
Downloads
Publicado
2020-11-06
Como Citar
Tereshchenko, E. A. ., Kovalev, V. V. ., Trofimov , M. S. ., & Zasseev , D. A. (2020). Legal consciousness as a factor promoting the achievement of educational objectives and the realization of the right to education by individuals and collectives. Revista Tempos E Espaços Em Educação, 13(32), 1–21. https://doi.org/10.20952/revtee.v13i32.14690
Edição
Seção
Publicação Contínua
Licença
À Revista Tempos e Espaços em Educação ficam reservados os direitos autorais pertinentes a todos os artigos nela publicados. A Revista Tempos e Espaços em Educação utiliza a licença https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (CC BY), que permite o compartilhamento do artigo com o reconhecimento da autoria.
