Characteristics of the self-regulation of middle school students in Russia during the period of distance learning
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.20952/revtee.v14i33.16755Keywords:
Secondary education, Distance learning, Self-regulation, Diagnostics of students’ self-regulatory activityAbstract
Distance learning can be considered as “self-regulated learning” as it involves students managing their own time, planning their own activities, and taking an active part in interactive communication with classmates and the teacher. The purpose of the study is to identify problems in middle school students’ self-regulation of learning activities during the period of distance learning. Based on a comparative analysis of international research, the study identifies the structural components of self-regulation in distance learning including self-organization, goal setting, planning, prediction, self-control, self-assessment, and reflection. The most significant structural component is students’ self-organization, which implies making a daily schedule, recording the tasks performed, controlling one’s actions in accordance with the daily schedule, as well as independently allocating time for homework. The study is based on a survey of 196 middle school students in the Republic of Komi, Russia. The results of the survey allow identifying the most vulnerable areas of students’ self-regulatory activity in the process of planning, organizing, and controlling their time and individual learning activities in a distance learning environment. The practical significance of the study lies in the possibility of using the data obtained to improve the process of distance learning. The materials of the study may be of use to managers, methodologists, and teachers in secondary education in developing methodological recommendations for students regarding the development of self-regulatory skills of middle school students.
Downloads
References
Barnard-Brak, L., Lan, W.Y., Paton, W.O. (2010). Profiles in self-regulated learning in the online learning environment. International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 11(1), 61-80.
Bol, L., Garner, J.K. (2011). Challenges in supporting self-regulation in distance education environments. Journal of Computing in Higher Education, 23(2), 104-123. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12528-011-9046-7
Chmiliar, L. (2011). Self-Regulation Skills and the PostSecondary Distance Learner, International Conference on Education and Educational Psychology (ICEEPSY 2011) Procedia. Social and Behavioral Sciences, 29, 318–321.
Gozman, L.Ia. (1999). Distantsionnoe obuchenie na poroge XXI veka [Distance learning on the verge of the 21st century]. Rostov-on-Don: “Mysl”.
Keegan, D. (2000). Distance Training: Taking Stock at a Time of Change. London: Routledge.
Kocdar, S., Karadeniz, A., Bozkurt, A., Buyuk, K. (2018). Measuring Self-Regulation in Self-Paced Open and Distance Learning Environments. International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 19(1). Retrieved from: http://www.irrodl.org/index.php/irrodl/article/view/3255/4503.
Kuo, Y.C., Walker, A.E., Schroder, K.E.E., Belland, B.R. (2014). Interaction, Internet self-efficacy, and self-regulated learning as predictors of student satisfaction in online education courses. Internet and Higher Education, 20, 35-50.
Lehmann, T., Hähnlein, I., Ifenthaler, D. (2014). Cognitive, metacognitive and motivational perspectives on reflection in self-regulated online learning. Computers in Human Behavior, 32, 313-323.
Moore, M.G. (1994). Autonomy and interdependence. The American Journal of Distance Education, 8(2), 15.
Moore, M.G., Kearsley, G. (2012). Distance education: A systems view of online learning. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth-Cengage Learning.
Morgan, S.E. (2013). Self-Regulation and Cultural Orientation on the Academic Achievement of University Students on Distance Education in Kampala, Uganda. Global Journal of Interdisciplinary Social Sciences, 2(4), 1-8. Retrieved from: https://www.longdom.org/articles/self-regulation-and-cultural-orientation-on-the-academic-achievement-of-university-students-on-distance-education-in-kam.pdf
Nazarov, V.L., Zherdev, D.V., Averbukh, N.V. (2021). Shokovaia tsifrovizatsiia obrazovaniia: vospriiatie uchastnikov obrazovatelnogo protsessa [The shock digitalization of education: the perception of participants in the educational process]. Education and science, 23(1), 156–20.
Nunan, T. (2000). Exploring the Concept of Flexibility. In V. Jakupec, & J. Garrick (Eds.), Flexible learning, human resource and organizational development. (pp. 46-66) London: Routledge.
Peters, O. (1983). Distance teaching and industrial production: a comparative interpretation in outline, in D. Sewart, D. Keegan y B. Holmberg (eds.), Distance Education: International Perspectives. London Croom Helm.
Poberezkaia, V.F., Novikova, N.N. (2021). Diagnostika reguliativnykh universalnykh uchebnykh deistvii obuchaiushchihsia v usloviiakh distantsionnogo obucheniia [Diagnostics of the universal regulatory learning actions of students in distance learning]. Scientific and methodological electronic journal “Koncept”, 5(May), 81–96. Retrieved from: http://e-koncept.ru/2021/211033.htm
Polat, E.S., Bukharkina, M.Iu., Moiseeva, M.V. (2004). Teoriia i praktika distantsionnogo obucheniia: Ucheb. posobie dlia studentov vysshikh pedagogicheskikh uchebnykh zavedenii [Theory and practice of distance learning: Textbook for students of pedagogical higher education institutions]. Moscow: “Akademiia”.
Porter, L.R. (1997). Creating the Virtual Classroom: Distance Learning with the Internet. New York.
Sewart, D. (1987). Mass Higher Education: Where are We Going? Ortner G. E., Graff K. and Wilmersdorfer H. Distance Education as two-way communication. Essays in Honour of Borje Holmberg, Frankfurt am Main, Berlin, Berne, New York, Paris, Vienna.
Shale, D. (1988). Toward a reconceptualization of distance education The American Journal of Distance Education, 2(3), 25-35.
Shale, D. (1988). Towards a Reconceptualization of Distance Education H Tire. American Journal of Distance Education, 2(3), 25.
Yukselturk, E., Bulut, S. (2007). Predictors for student success in an online course. Educational Technology & Society, 10(2), 71-83.
Zhivotovskaia, I.G. (2002). Teoriia i praktika distantsionnogo obucheniia [Theory and practice of distance learning]. Distantsionnoe obuchenie v sovremennom mire. Moscow.
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
À Revista Tempos e Espaços em Educação ficam reservados os direitos autorais pertinentes a todos os artigos nela publicados. A Revista Tempos e Espaços em Educação utiliza a licença https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (CC BY), que permite o compartilhamento do artigo com o reconhecimento da autoria.
