Investigación psicológica y pedagógica de la axiosfera de la generación más joven como una de las actividades del Tecnoparque
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.20952/revtee.v14i33.15620Palabras clave:
Tecnoparque, Axiosfera, Generación Z, Subcultura, Imagen del mundoResumen
La educación adicional y orientada a la creatividad de la generación más joven de rusos en los tecnoparques escolares requiere el estudio de las características de la Generación Z. Los valores fueron comparados como lo señalaron los encuestados (estudiantes de primer año y estudiantes que ingresan a la universidad) entre diferentes generaciones de rusos: su propio mundo (el mundo de los niños), el mundo de los padres y el mundo de los abuelos. Las tres generaciones están dominadas por estar orientadas hacia el trabajo duro, el estudio, la asistencia mutua tanto dentro del entorno global como dentro de una sociedad pequeña, es decir, dentro de la familia. Estas posiciones están representadas por las capas fraseológicas del idioma, lo que indica su presencia en la cosmovisión del valor nacional ruso. En el mundo de los padres y en el de los hijos se registra la emergencia de nuevos grupos de valores ausentes en el mundo de los abuelos: orientación hacia los valores del consumidor, percibida desde la publicidad en los medios, y al mismo tiempo la extinción del valor de los abuelos. al servicio de la patria. Un nuevo valor se destaca en el mundo de los niños: un enfoque humorístico de los problemas de la vida, que puede considerarse global porque contiene citas de la literatura mundial y unidades fraseológicas prestadas. Este valor se distingue por una visión optimista del mundo y el papel del hombre en él, que es característico de la juventud. Los resultados de la investigación permiten afirmar que la Generación Z está lista para ser creativa y está orientada hacia la tecnología. Tener en cuenta las peculiaridades de la generación permite organizar científicamente actividades de ocio educativo en tecnoparques.
Descargas
Citas
Albert, M., Hurrelmann, K., Leven, I., Quenzel, G., & Schneekloth, U. (2019). The utility of the term ‘’generation’ in sociology and youth research. A reply to Martin Schröder’s thesis on the “Generation Myth”. Kölner Zeitschrift für Soziologie und Sozialpsychologie, 71 (3), 457¬–469.
Arutyunova, N.D. (1993). Introduction. In Arutyunova, N. D. & Ryabtseva, N.K. (Eds.) Logical analysis of language. Mental acts (pp. 3–6). Nauka.
Bakhtin, M.M. (1975). Rabelais and Gogol (the art of word and the folk culture of laughter). In Bakhtin, M.M. Questions of literature and aesthetics. Studies of different years (pp. 496–485). Khudozhestvennaya literatura.
Bykov, A.V. & Nastina, E.A. (2020). Link of the value attitudes with career achievements (based in a survey of youth). Sociological Studies, 8, 67–77.
Brito, R. dos S., Prado, J. R., & Nunes, C. P. (2017). As condições de trabalho docente e o pós-estado de bem-estar social. Revista Tempos e Espaços em Educação,10(23), 165-174.
Evans, V. (2009). Semantic representation in LCCM theory. In Evans, V. & Pourcel, S. (Eds.), New directions in cognitive linguistics (pp. 27¬–56). John Benjamin’s Publishing Company.
Fischer, K. (2010). Quantitative methods in Cognitive Semantics. Introduction to the volume. In Glynn, D. & Fischer, K. (Eds.), Quantitative methods in Cognitive Semantics: Corpus-driven approaches (pp. 43¬–59). Walter de Gruyter.
Glynn, D. (2009). Polysemy, syntax, and variation. A usage-based method for Cognitive Semantics. In Evans, V. & Pourcel, S. (Eds.), New directions in cognitive linguistics (pp. 77¬–104). John Benjamin’s Publishing Company.
Glynn, D. (2010). Corpus-driven Cognitive Semantics. Introduction to the field. In Glynn, D. & Fischer, K. (Eds.), Quantitative methods in Cognitive Semantics: Corpus-driven approaches (pp. 1¬–42). Walter de Gruyter.
Hunston, S. (2011). Corpus approaches to evaluation. Phraseology and evaluative language. Routledge.
Kiryakova, A.V., Chelpachenko, T.V., Shabalina, L.G., Maslova, A.I., Zhukov, V.A., Makarov, A.L., Aleksandrova, E.A., & Popova, O.V. (2020). Value orientations: What portrait of modern students is? Revista San Gregorio, 37, 1–9.
Klinov, V. & Blotskiy, S. (2016). Forming senior school students’ values of leisure at rural schools in the course of physical education. Science and Education, 8, 79–85.
Kolesnik, E.A., Stepanov, V.G., & Pavlova, LL. (2020). The Study of the phenomenon of the youth subculture and its place in the cultural and educational environment of the Russian higher education institution. Amazonia Investiga, 9 (26), 88–96.
Kononenko, O., Kononenko, A., Stynska, V., Kachmar, O., Prokopiv, L., Katolyk, H., & Popovych, I. (2020). Research of the factor structure of the model of world view settings at a young age. Revista Inclusiones, 7 (3), 98–116.
Langacker, R. (2009). Constructions and constructional meaning. In Evans, V. & Pourcel, S. (Eds.), New directions in cognitive linguistics (pp. 225¬–268). John Benjamin’s Publishing Company.
Lukyanov, O.V., Chastokolenko, J.B., & Kotikova, K.O. (2016). Freedom authentication in creative youth subcultures. Siberian Journal of Psychology, 61, 91–108.
Maslova, V.A. (2011). Concepts and values: the contents of meanings and their language interpretation. Scientific Notes of Taurida National V.I. Vernadsky University. Series “Philology. Social Communications”, 24 (63), 383–387.
Melnichuk, M.V., Gruzina, Y.M., & Firsova, I.A. (2019). Formation of scientific and educational values in the system of youth motivation. Economic and Social Changes: Facts, Trends, Forecast, 12 (6), 260–275.
Motroshilova, N.V. (2010). Civilization and barbarism in an epoch of global crises (2nd ed.). Institute of Philosophy, Russian Academy of Sciences.
Nemova, O.A., Vagin, D.Y., Tsyplakova, S.A., Bystrova, N.V., Kutepova, L.I., & Kozlova, I.M. (2020). Labor values and labor attitudes among students of secondary vocational schools in Nizhny Novgorod: as revealed by the sociological survey. International Journal of Applied Exercise Physiology, 9 (2), 73–80.
Nosova S.S., & Kuzheleva-Sagan, I.P. (2013). Youth in network information and communicative society: Foreign approaches to study issues. Siberian Journal of Psychology, 49, 85–96.
Podolskiy, A.I. & Idobaeva, O.A. (2019). Quo vadis? Trajectories of value-motivational development of modern Russian youth. Voprosy Voprosy Psychologii, 2, 45–58.
Poplavskaya, A. (2020). What do we know about 21st century youth? American teens through the eyes of a psychologist. Journal of Economic Sociology, 21 (3), 84–100.
Popova, Z.D. & Sternin, I.A. (2007). Cognitive linguistics. AST: Vostok–Zapad.
Rozina, R.I. (1994). Cognitive and taxonomic relations. Categorisation of the world in language and in text. Topics in the Study of Language, 6, 60–78.
Sapa, A.V. (2014). Generation Z – the generation of the FSES epoch. Innovative Projects and Programs in Education, 2, 24–30.
Savoiskaya, N.P. (2014). New directions in modern cognitive linguistics. Issues of Cognitive Linguistics, 2 (39), 83–89.
Shaposhnikova, T.L., Tuchina, O.R., Gordienko, O.A., Rus-Bryushinina, I.V., Zinkovskaya, V.E., Apollonov, I.A., Mukha, V.N., Romanov, D.A., Lyalyuk, A.V., Egorova, A.Yu., Rykhalsky, Yu.S., Teryukha, R.V., Glukhenkiy, I.Yu., Kotlyarova, E.A., Tarasenko, N.A., Romanova, M.L., & Rykova, E.V. (2018). Digital humanities in the conditions of the educational environment of the south of Russia at the service of tolerance (axiological component in teaching Russian to foreign students). Kuban State Technological University.
Shapochkin, D.V. (2013). Cognitive discourse analysis in linguistics. Bulletin of Chelyabinsk State University, 10 (301), 101–107.
Shindryaeva, I.V. (2015). Professional value orientations of youth in the context of generational theory. Bulletin of the Volga Region Institute of Administration, 6 (51), 145–148.
Silva, L. R., Santos, A. R., & Santos, I. T. R. (2020). Public policies for education of/in the field and the school environment in a settlement of the MST: the intimate relationship with the pedagogical policy. Journal of Research and Knowledge Spreading, 1(1), e11737.
Sternin, I.A. (2005). Types of meanings and concept. In Kubryakova, E.S. (Ed.), Conceptual space of language (pp. 257–282). Tambov State University Publishing House.
Stolovich, L.N. (2004). On values common to all mankind. Problems of Philosophy, 7, 86–97.
Strauss, W. & Howe, N. (1997). The fourth turning: An American prophecy – What the cycles of history tell us about America’s next rendezvous with destiny. Crown.
Sychev, O.A., Belousov, K.I., & Protasova, I.N. (2019). Values and moral foundations as a basis for the socio-political views of youth. Siberian Journal of Psychology, 73, 60–77.
Talmy, L. (2000). Toward a cognitive semantics. MIT Press.
Vinogradova, S.A. (2014). Cognitive linguistics on meaning and concept. Issues of Cognitive Linguistics, 2, 50–55.
Descargas
Publicado
Cómo citar
Número
Sección
Licencia
À Revista Tempos e Espaços em Educação ficam reservados os direitos autorais pertinentes a todos os artigos nela publicados. A Revista Tempos e Espaços em Educação utiliza a licença https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (CC BY), que permite o compartilhamento do artigo com o reconhecimento da autoria.
