Visibility of peri-urban agroecology during the pandemic: the use of social media for the militancy of the dish
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.21669/tomo.vi38.14605Keywords:
Pericity, Social networks, Agroecology, Consumption, PandemicAbstract
We intend to look into ways in which -from the global COVID-19 pandemic- agroecological products became virtually visible and the debate on food sovereignty increased in collective social concerns. In this sense, we start from the reality that virtual social networks are enhanced by information and communication technologies, linked to the traditional network gaze made up of entities and by relationships between these entities From the advent of the global world, the networks were revitalized by the web and acquired new social dynamics, took different forms and dimensions , as in virtual space they multiply (Kauchakje, Penna, Frey, Klaus and Duarte: 2006). In order to research the habits of pre-pandemic food consumption and the modifications made during it, we develop a survey whose results we present in this work, thus aiming to provide current data on the choices, access possibilities, knowledge, etc. about food and its origin. We appeal to the concepts of agroecology and pericity, considering the practices and the study space. The first refers to the “field of knowledge that gathers, synthesizes and applies knowledge of agronomy, ecology, sociology,
ethnobotany and other related sciences, with a holistic and systemicperspective, to generate, validate and apply appropriate strategies for the design, management and evaluation of sustainable agri-food systems’’ (Sarandón and Flores, 2020, p. 59). The second is defined as “border territory subjected to social and economic processes related to the capitalist valorization of space, as a result of the actual or potential incorporation of new lands into the city” (Feito and Barsky, 2020, p. 897). While we will look at various experiences, we will focus on the case of the “Pueblo a Pueblo” cooperative, a marketing initiative that proposes to be constituted as alternative consumption, distribute healthy food, at fair price and through decent work.
Downloads
References
Altieri, Miguel Angel y Nicholls, Clara Ines. Agroecología: única esperanza para la soberanía alimentaria y la resiliencia socioecologica, Agroecología, Murcia, 7 (2), 2012, p. 65-83.
Arce, Alejandra. Mujeres, familia y trabajo. Chacra, caña y algodón en la Argentina (1930-1960).Bernal: UNQ, 2018.
Carballo, Carlos. Soberanía alimentaria y producción de alimentos en Argentina. En Gorban, Miryan K; Carballo, Carlos. Mercedes, Paiva; [et al.] Seguridad y Soberanía alimentaria. Buenos Aires: Colección Cuadernos, 2011.
Castells, Manuel. Redes de indignación y esperanza. España: Alianza, 2012.
Cimadevilla, Gustavo. Rurbanidad y TIC, un rompecabezas de pocas piezas, II Workshop “Usos y representaciones de las TIC en el agro argentino: repen-sar el espacio desde la virtualidad”, Bernal, 2020. Disponible en: <https://jornadasruralescear.files.wordpress.com/2020/09/2.-cimadevilla-1.pdf>.
Clark, Louise. Manual para el Mapeo de Redes como una Herramienta de Diagnóstico. La Paz, Bolivia: Centro Internacional de Agricultura Tropical, 2006.Cooperativa Pueblo a Pueblo. Documentos Internos. Mimeo, 2020.
Desmarais, Annette Aurélie. La Vía Campesina. La globalización y el poder del campesinado. Madrid: Editorial Popular., 317 p., 2007.
Feito, María Carolina y Barsky, Andrés. Periurbano. En: Muzlera, Jose y Salo-món, Alejandra Diccionario del Ago Iberoamericano, Segunda Edición. Bue-nos Aires: Tesseo, 2020. Disponible en: <https://www.teseopress.com/diccio-narioagro/chapter/periurbano>.
McMichael, Philip. Regímenes alimentarios y cuestiones agrarias. México. D.F.: Universidad Autónoma de Zacatecas; Red Internacional de Migración y desarrollo. 2015.
Kauchakje, Samira; Penna, Manoel Camillo; Frey, Klaus y Duarte, Fábio. Redes socio técnicas y participación ciudadana: propuestas conceptuales y analíticas para el uso de las TICs. REDES, España, Vol.11, Nro. 3, 2006.
Pinto, Lucas Henrique. Soberanía alimentaria, justicia ambiental y resistencia campesina territorial frente a los cambios metabólicos del libre comercio: apuntes teóricos y empíricos desde la experiencia mexicana. Razón y Palabra. Dossier: Prácticas alimentarias desde una perspectiva sistémica completa, Vol. 20, Nro. 3_94, Quito, Ecuador, 2016, p. 517-542.
Pinto, Lucas. Henrique. Agroecología y recampesinización cualitativa en el agro argentino contemporáneo (2014-2019). Boletín De Estudios Geográfi-cos, (113), 2020, p. 161-180.
Sarandón, Santiago y Flores, Claudia. Agroecología. En: Muzlera, Jose y Salomón, Alejandra. Diccionario del Ago Iberoamericano, Segunda Edición. Bue-nos Aires: Tesseo, 2020. Disponible en: <https://www.teseopress.com/diccio-narioagro/chapter/agroecologia>.
Schreiner, Davi. Territorialidades em disputa. Os assentamentos, o MST e a luta coletiva. Actas de las 3ras Jornadas Internacionales de Problemas Latino-americanos: Movimientos Sociales, Estados y partidos Políticos en Amé-rica Latina: (re) configuraciones institucionales, experiencias de organi-zación y resistencia. (CD-ROM), Mendoza, 2012.
Sevilla Guzmán, Eduardo y Soller Montiel, Marta. Del desarrollo rural a la agroecología. Hacia un cambio de paradigma. Documentación Social, Nro. 155, 2009.
Soller Montiel, Marta y Pérez Neira, David. Canales cortos de comercialización alimentaria en la construcción de sistemas agroalimentarios alternativos. En: Cuéllar, Mamen., Calle Ángel y Gallar, David (eds.) Procesos hacia la soberanía alimentaria: Perspectivas y prácticas desde la agroecología política. Barcelona: Icaria, 2013, p. 63-80.
Stølen, Kristi Anne. La decencia de la desigualdad. Buenos Aires: Antropo-fagia, 2004.
Svampa, Maristella y Viale, Enrique. El colapso ecológico ya llegó. Una brújula para salir del (mal)desarrollo. Buenos Aires: Siglo XXI, 2020.
Vales, Laura. El boom de ventas de los bolsones de frutas y verduras durante la cuarentena. Página 12, Buenos Aires, 2020. Recuperado de: <https://www.pagina12.com.ar/262117-el-boom-de-ventas-de-los-bolsones-de-frutas-y-verduras-duran>.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
TOMO journal adopts the Creative Commons CC-BY 4.0 license which allows:
• Share: copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format.
• Adapt: remix, transform, and create from the material for any purpose, even commercial.
Authors who publish in this journal agree to the following terms:
a) Authors retain copyright and grant the journal the right of first publication, with the work simultaneously licensed under the Creative Commons which allows sharing the work with acknowledgment of authorship and initial publication in this journal.
b) Authors are authorized to assume additional contracts separately, for non-exclusive distribution of the version of the work published in this journal (eg, publishing in an institutional repository or as a book chapter), with acknowledgment of authorship and initial publication in this journal.
c) Authors are allowed and encouraged to publish and distribute their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their personal page) at any point before or during the editorial process, as this can generate productive changes, as well as increase the impact and citation of the published work (O Efeito do Acesso Livre).