INHUMAN ANTHROPOLOGY IN FOUCAULT AND SAFATLE
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.47250/intrell.v31i1.11492Abstract
This article aims to problematize education according to the concept of inhuman in Foucault (2007) and Safatle (2012). To a last extent, this is meant to confront a way of thinking man in Anthropology. These philosophers put in check the subjects, the man; they question the very way of being man and the anthropology. The capacity of representation as the organizer of the human ways of life is put in question. It should be asked: if education seems to be directed towards the formation of man, what would be an education from the point of view of an inhuman anthropology?
Keywords: Inhuman. Education. Representation. Philosophy.
Downloads
References
ABBAGNANO, N. Dicionário de Filosofia. Tradução de Alfredo Bosi. São Paulo: Martins Fontes, 2007.
CASTRO, E. Vocabulário de Foucault. 2. ed. Tradução de Ingrid Muller Xavier. Belo Horizonte: Ed. Autêntica, 2016.
FOUCAULT, M. As palavras e as coisas. 9. ed. Tradução de Salma Tannus Muchail. São Paulo: Martins Fontes, 2007.
FOUCAULT, M. A arqueologia do saber. 7. ed. Tradução de Luís Felipe Baeta Neves. Rio de Janeiro: Forense Universitária, 2008.
SAFATLE, V. Grande hotel abismo: Por uma reconstrução da teoria do reconhecimento. São Paulo: Martins Fontes, 2012.
SLOTERDIJK, P. Regras para o parque humano. Tradução de José Oscar de Almeida Marques. São Paulo: Estação Liberdade, 2000.
