Application of design and technological activities as a method of improving the professionalization of specialists of higher educational institutions

Autores

  • Lesia L. Makarenko National Pedagogical Dragomanov University. Kyiv, Ukraine.
  • Volodymyr M. Slabko National Pedagogical Dragomanov University. Kyiv, Ukraine.
  • Oleksandr M. Bordiuk National Pedagogical Dragomanov University. Kyiv, Ukraine.
  • Yurii V. Shpylovyi National Pedagogical Dragomanov University. Kyiv, Ukraine.
  • Tetiana M. Slaboshevska National Pedagogical Dragomanov University. Kyiv, Ukraine.

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.20952/revtee.v13i32.14953

Palavras-chave:

Design and technological activity, Pedagogical design, Pedagogical programming concept, Training students of a higher education institution; Competence development model; Professional education.

Resumo

In this article we developed the concept of design and technological activities. We tested the need to develop design competence in educational process of the Faculty of Law of the National Economic University with 50 teachers and 200 students of the Faculty comprising Law, International Law, Law Enforcement, Social Work, and Psychology. Design competence is knowledge for preparation of pedagogical projects and their implementation, developed in the educational process. The current stage is characterized by globalization of problems requiring involvement of the world community, changes the paradigm of education, posing new challenges to the educational sphere. Accelerating pace of socio-economic development requires to plan and evaluate life and professional prospects. It becomes important for teachers to learn how to design pedagogical reality, predict the consequences of its transformations and teach students to build their lives on the basis of design. These trends urge the problem of design, make it interdisciplinary, exceptionally large-scale and pressing. Promising areas for development of design and technological activities include: identification of new patterns and principles of pedagogical design; identification of new factors and conditions for successful operation and development of design activities; development of theoretical background for training, retraining and advanced training of personnel in the field of pedagogical design; detailed development of methodological and technological support of the pedagogical design process; improvement of the qualimetric tools of design activity. Verification of the concept against the background of the identified set of pedagogical conditions showed an increase in the efficiency of design and technological activities.

Downloads

Não há dados estatísticos.

Biografia do Autor

Lesia L. Makarenko, National Pedagogical Dragomanov University. Kyiv, Ukraine.

Doctor of Pedagogical Sciences, Professor of the Department of Information Systems and Technologies, Faculty of Engineering and Education, National Pedagogical Dragomanov University. Kyiv, Ukraine.

ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6062-8834

Volodymyr M. Slabko, National Pedagogical Dragomanov University. Kyiv, Ukraine.

Doctor of Pedagogical Sciences, Associate Professor, Head of the Department of Adult Education, Faculty of of Management of Education and Science, National Pedagogical Dragomanov University. Kyiv, Ukraine.

ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5175-3104

Oleksandr M. Bordiuk, National Pedagogical Dragomanov University. Kyiv, Ukraine.

Ph.D., Associate Professor at the Department of Information Systems and Technologies, Faculty of Engineering and Education, National Pedagogical Dragomanov University. Kyiv, Ukraine.

ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0729-2571

Yurii V. Shpylovyi, National Pedagogical Dragomanov University. Kyiv, Ukraine.

Ph.D., Associate Professor at the Department of Information Systems and Technologies, Faculty of Engineering and Education, National Pedagogical Dragomanov University. Kyiv, Ukraine.

ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6365-2661

Tetiana M. Slaboshevska, National Pedagogical Dragomanov University. Kyiv, Ukraine.

Ph.D., Associate Professor at the Department of Information Systems and Technologies, Faculty of Engineering and Education, National Pedagogical Dragomanov University. Kyiv, Ukraine.

ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8468-4950

Referências

Quinn, J. B., Anderson, P., & Finkelstein, S. (1996). Leveraging intellect. Academy of Management Perspectives, 10(3), 7-27.‏
Liou, P. Y., & Hung, Y. C. (2015). Statistical techniques utilized in analyzing PISA and TIMSS data in science education from 1996 to 2013: A methodological review. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 13(6), 1449-1468.‏
Baird, L., Schneier, C. E., & Laird, D. (Eds.). (1983). The training and development sourcebook. Human Resource Development Press.‏
Brito, C. D. A., & Nunes, C. P. (2020). The intensification of teaching work in the context of the commercialization of higher education in Brazil. Journal of Research and Knowledge Spreading, 1(1), 1-17.
Gessler, L. (1988). Bildungserfolg im Spiegel von Bildungsbiographien. Frankfurt aM.‏
Yorulmaz, Y. I., Altinkurt, Y., & Yilmaz, K. (2015). The Relationship between Teachers' Occupational Professionalism and Organizational Alienation. Online Submission, 4, 31-44.‏C. I. Redína, A. Erro-Garcés. Stress in teaching professionals across Europe, International Journal of Educational Research, Vol. 103, 101623, 2020.
Forkosh Baruch, A., & Meishar Tal, H. (Eds.). (2019). Mobile Technologies in Educational Organizations. IGI Global.‏
Fullagar, S. (2019). A physical cultural studies perspective on physical (in)activity and health inequalities: the biopolitics of body practices and embodied movement. Revista Tempos e Espaços em Educação, 12(28), 63-76.
Bonwell, C. C., & Eison, J. A. (1991). Active Learning: Creating Excitement in the Classroom. 1991 ASHE-ERIC Higher Education Reports. ERIC Clearinghouse on Higher Education, The George Washington University, One Dupont Circle, Suite 630, Washington, DC 20036-1183.‏
Deng, L., & Tavares, N. J. (2013). From Moodle to Facebook: Exploring students' motivation and experiences in online communities. Computers & Education, 68, 167-176.‏
Ebrahimi, M. A. (2020). Cultural value of translation of proverbs and synopsis. Journal of Research and Knowledge Spreading, 1(1), 1-10.
Zhou, C. (Ed.). (2020). Introducing Problem-Based Learning (PBL) for Creativity and Innovation in Chinese Universities: Emerging Research and Opportunities: Emerging Research and Opportunities. IGI global.‏
Dupuy, A., Ishutkin, V., Pickl, S., & Tschiedel, R. (2011). Judgment Based Analysis via an Interactive Learning Software for Modern Operations Research Education and Training. In Operations Research Proceedings 2010 (pp. 623-628). Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg.‏
Dias, A. F., Cardoso, H. de M., Santos, A. L. dos, Menezes, C. A. A., & Rios, P. P. S. (2017). Schooling and subversions of gender. Revista Tempos e Espaços em Educação, 10(22), 83-92.
Kramer, C., König, J., Strauß, S., & Kaspar, K. (2020). Classroom videos or transcripts? A quasi-experimental study to assess the effects of media-based learning on pre-service teachers’ situation-specific skills of classroom management. International Journal of Educational Research, 103, 101624.‏
Moriña, A., & Orozco, I. (2020). Planning and implementing actions for students with disabilities: Recommendations from faculty members who engage in inclusive pedagogy. International Journal of Educational Research, 103, 101639.‏
Matthews, K. E. (2017). Five propositions for genuine students as partners practice. International Journal for Students as Partners, 1(2).‏
Su, Y. C. (2006). EFL teachers’ perceptions of English language policy at the elementary level in Taiwan. Educational Studies, 32(3), 265-283.‏
Antikainen, A. (2006). In search of the Nordic model in education. Scandinavian journal of educational research, 50(3), 229-243.‏
Hannula, M. S. (2007). Finnish research on affect in mathematics: blended theories, mixed methods and some findings. ZDM, 39(3), 197-203.‏
Sternberg, R. J. (2006). The nature of creativity. Creativity research journal, 18(1), 87.‏
Sternberg, R. J. (2006). The nature of creativity. Creativity research journal, 18(1), 87.‏
Schuelka, M. J. (2013). Excluding students with disabilities from the culture of achievement: The case of the TIMSS, PIRLS, and PISA. Journal of Education Policy, 28(2), 216-230.‏
Santos, I. T. R., Barreto, D. A. B., & Soares, C. V. C. O. (2020). Formative assessment in the classroom: the dialogue between teachers and students. Journal of Research and Knowledge Spreading, 1(1), 1-14.
Torrance, E. P. (1988).
Smit, B. H., Meirink, J. A., Berry, A. K., & Admiraal, W. F. (2020). Source, respondent, or partner? Involvement of secondary school students in participatory action research. International Journal of Educational Research, 100, 101544.‏
M. Knoll. 300 Jahre lernen am Projekt. Zur Revision unseres Geschichtsbildes [300 years of learning on the project. To revise our view of history], Pedagogik, Vol. 45, No.7–8, 58–63, 1993.
Fried-Booth, D. L. (2002). Project work. Oxford University Press.‏

Downloads

Publicado

2020-12-11

Como Citar

Makarenko, L. L. ., Slabko, V. M. ., Bordiuk, O. M. ., Shpylovyi, Y. V. ., & Slaboshevska, T. M. . (2020). Application of design and technological activities as a method of improving the professionalization of specialists of higher educational institutions. Revista Tempos E Espaços Em Educação, 13(32), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.20952/revtee.v13i32.14953

Edição

Seção

Publicação Contínua

Artigos Semelhantes

Você também pode iniciar uma pesquisa avançada por similaridade para este artigo.