Technology of Using Linguistic Markers in the Process of Art Therapy Training

Authors

  • Marina Georgiyevna Sergeeva Research Institute of the Federal Penitentiary Service of the Russian Federation, Moscow, Russia.
  • Andrei Anatolievich Kochin Research Institute of the Federal Penitentiary Service of the Russian Federation, Moscow, Russia.
  • Dmitry Vladimirovich Lukashenko Research Institute of the Federal Penitentiary Service of the Russian Federation, Moscow, Russia.
  • Ekaterina Vladislavovna Kozhina Peoples’ Friendship University of Russia (RUDN University), Moscow, Russia.

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.20952/revtee.v14i33.16264

Keywords:

Reflexivity, Reflexive processes, Linguistic markers, Psychological health

Abstract

The article examines the issues of students’ reflexivity, the impact of the reflexivity on the educational process and psychological health, the importance of its development. The purpose of the article is the theoretical and empirical study of students’ reflexivity through its expression in various linguistic markers, the importance of reflexivity in the personal and potential professional development of students. The research methodology and its algorithm were selected due to the purpose of the study. Experimental work included a complex psychological and pedagogical experiment, diagnosing the stated parameters and their subsequent statistical analysis. The study of students’ reflexivity was carried out on the basis of the Institute of Foreign Languages of the Federal State Autonomous Educational Institution of Higher Education “The Peoples’ Friendship University of Russia ”(RUDN). Research sampling: reports (essays) of the 1-4 year students. The target group consisted of 98 students, divided into seven subgroups. The results of the study allowed us to conclude that there is a significant interdependence between linguistic markers and students’ reflexivity. Psychological health is a necessary and important condition for the full development of a personality. On the one hand, it ensures the adequate fulfillment of social roles, on the other hand, it creates the possibility of continuous personal and professional development throughout life. Supporting psychological health is one of the urgent tasks in the young age, the most important stage in the formation of a personality. Reflexivity of students, appearing in the process of consulting or training work, manifests itself, first of all, in speech processes. Group reflexivity, in turn, is the main method of psychological training, since it helps to comprehend and integrate the ongoing experience.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

Marina Georgiyevna Sergeeva, Research Institute of the Federal Penitentiary Service of the Russian Federation, Moscow, Russia.

Andrei Anatolievich Kochin, Research Institute of the Federal Penitentiary Service of the Russian Federation, Moscow, Russia.

Dmitry Vladimirovich Lukashenko, Research Institute of the Federal Penitentiary Service of the Russian Federation, Moscow, Russia.

Ekaterina Vladislavovna Kozhina, Peoples’ Friendship University of Russia (RUDN University), Moscow, Russia.

References

Ananiev, B. G. (1996). The structure of the development of psychophysiological functions of an adult. Selected psychological works, 1, 200-206.

Bírová, J., Kružlík, P., Kalimullin, A., Sokolova, N., Haroun, Z., Králik, R., & Vasbieva, D. (2018). Mathematical and statistical bibliometric indicators for scholars in the field of romance languages and linguistics. EURASIA: Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 14(12), em1638. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/97826

Blinova, S., Dugina, T., & Zabolotskikh, A. (2018). Teaching mixed nationality groups (on the example of students from the Northern Caucasus region). In: INTED2018: Proceedings of the 12th International Technology, Education and Development Conference, Valencia, Spain, March 5-7, 2018, pp. 7977-7982.

Chalikova, O. S. (2017) Personal predictors of professional success of technical specialists. Proceedings of the Ural Federal University. Series 1: problems of education, science and culture, 23(1(159)), 86–92.

Dolzhich, E., & Dmitrichenkova, S. (2018). Computer science terminology (a case study of the Spanish language). In: INTED2018: Proceedings of the 12th International Technology, Education and Development Conference, Valencia, Spain, March 5-7, 2018, pp. 2556-2559.

Dubrovina, I. V. (2009). Psychological service in modern education: workbook. Saint Petersburg: Publishing House Peter, 400 p.

Gorev, P., Telegina, N., Karavanova, L., & Feshina, S. (2018). Puzzles as a didactic tool for development of mathematical abilities of junior schoolchildren in basic and additional mathematical education. EURASIA: Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 14(10), 178-185. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/93675

Gromova, L. Yu., & Tekucheva, I. V. (2017). On some general purpose of teaching the Russian language. Prospects for Science, 5(92), 65-68.

Karpov, A. V. (2006). Book about the inner world of man. Questions of psychology, 5, 177-179.

Koldochevsky, D. E. (2017). Linguistic markers of reflection as an indicator of psychological health (on the example of art therapy groups): graduation paper 37.04.01. The first President of Russia B. N. Yeltsin Ural. Feder. University, Yekaterinburg, 120 p.

Leontiev, D. A. (2011). New guidelines for understanding personality in psychology: from the necessary to the possible. Questions of psychology, 1, 3-27.

Sharonova, S., Trubnikova, N., & Sokolova, N. (2018). Interpreting religious symbols as basic component of social value formation. European Journal of Science and Theology, 14(3), 117-129.

Tekucheva, I. V. (2006). Theory and methods of teaching the Russian language. Practical training: guidelines. Moscow: Moscow Humanitarian Pedagogical institute.

Tekucheva, I. V. (2018). On the basic category “teaching method” in textbooks on the methodology of teaching the Russian language at the beginning of the 20th century. Bulletin of the Moscow State Regional University. Series: Pedagogy, 1, 82-90.

Tekucheva, I. V., & Gromova, L. Yu. (2015). Teaching to read: the historical aspect of the problem. In: Education, science and economics in universities and schools. Integration into the international educational space. Proceedings of the international scientific conference, Goris, Armenia, September 28 – October 2, 2015, pp. 381-385.

Tekucheva, I. V., & Gromova, L. Y. (2016). On present state of teaching Russian language in Russia. International Journal of Environmental and Science Education, 11(14), 6504-6511.

Vasbieva, D. G., Sokolova, N. L., Masalimova, A. R., Shinkaruk, V. M., & Kiva-Khamzina, Y. L. (2018). Exploring the EFL teacher’s role in a smart learning environment – a review study. XLinguae, 11(2), 265-274. https://doi.org/10.18355/XL.2018.11.02.21

Volkova, Y., & Panchenko, N. (2018). Discourse variation of the concepts of destructive emotions. Vestnik Rossiiskogo Universiteta Druzhby Narodov. Russian journal of linguistics, 22(1), 175-194. https://doi.org/10.22363/2312-9182-2018-22-1-175-194

Downloads

Published

2021-08-24

How to Cite

Sergeeva, M. G. ., Kochin, A. A., Lukashenko, D. V., & Kozhina, E. V. (2021). Technology of Using Linguistic Markers in the Process of Art Therapy Training. Revista Tempos E Espaços Em Educação, 14(33), e16264. https://doi.org/10.20952/revtee.v14i33.16264

Issue

Section

Publicação Contínua