INTELIGÊNCIA ARTIFICIAL GENERATIVA NA EDUCAÇÃO BÁSICA:  O CASO DO PROTÓTIPO CYBERSCHOLAR

Ana Karina Nascimento; Vania Castro; Raigul Zheldibayeva; Bill Cope

doi:10.32748/revec.v11i27.22720

Autores

Ana Karina Nascimento Universidade Federal de Sergipe https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3014-0659
Vania Castro University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4930-5345
Raigul Zheldibayeva Zhetysu University named after Ilyas Zhansugurov https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8757-0748
Bill Cope University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2129-395X

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.32748/revec.v11i27.22720

Palavras-chave:

geração de feedback, escrita, engenharia de prompt, curadoria humana

Resumo

Este artigo explora a implementação do CyberScholar, ferramenta de inteligência artificial generativa (IAG) em desenvolvimento para fornecer feedback sobre a escrita de alunos da educação básica em diferentes disciplinas escolares. Os testes foram conduzidos nos 7º, 8º, 10º e 11º anos, em quatro escolas nos Estados Unidos. Usando "engenharia de prompt" e "ajuste fino" de um Modelo Robusto de Linguagem (LLM) via Geração de Recuperação Aumentada (RAG), o estudo analisa qualitativamente o potencial do protótipo para aprimorar as habilidades de escrita dos alunos e dar suporte ao trabalho dos professores. Ainda, aborda o papel da curadoria humana na obtenção de resultados da IAG e especula sobre seu futuro na educação.

Downloads

Não há dados estatísticos.

Biografia do Autor

Ana Karina Nascimento, Universidade Federal de Sergipe

Ana Karina de Oliveira Nascimento é doutora em Letras pela Universidade de São Paulo. É professora do Departamento de Letras Estrangeiras e do Programa de Pós-graduação em Letras da Universidade Federal de Sergipe. Bolsista de Pós-doutorado no Exterior do CNPq - Brasil.

Vania Castro, University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign

É doutora em Linguística Aplicada pela Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais. É professora no Departamento de Education Policy, Organization and Leadership, Universidade de Illinois Urbana-Champaign, Estados Unidos da América.

Raigul Zheldibayeva, Zhetysu University named after Ilyas Zhansugurov

É doutora em Educação e Psicologia pela Zhetysu university, Cazaquistão. É professora no Departamento de Pedagogia e Psicologia na Zhetysu University, previamente I. Zhansugurov, no Cazaquistão.

Bill Cope, University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign

É doutor em educação pela Macquarie University, Austrália. É professor no Departamento de Education Policy, Organization and Leadership, Universidade de Illinois Urbana-Champaign, Estados Unidos da América.

Referências

AKGUN, Selin; GREENHOW, Christine. Artificial intelligence in education: addressing ethical challenges in K-12 settings. AI and Ethics, v. 2, p. 431–440, 2022. Disponível em: https://doi.org/10.1007/s43681-021-00096-7. Acesso em: 15 jan. 2025. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s43681-021-00096-7

BAKER, Ryan S.; HAWN, Aaron. Algorithmic bias in education. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, v. 32, p. 1052–1092, 2022. Disponível em: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40593-021-00285-9. Acesso em: 02 set. 2024. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40593-021-00285-9

BASHAM, James D.; ISRAEL, Maya; GRADEN, Janet; POTH, Rita; WINSTON, Markay. A comprehensive approach to RTI: Embedding Universal Design for Learning and technology. Learning Disability Quarterly, v. 33(Fall), p. 243-255, 2010. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/073194871003300403

BRANSFORD, John D.; BROWN, Ann L.; COCKING, Rodney R. (Eds.). How people learn: Brain, mind, experience, and school. Washington: National Academy Press, 2000.

CAST. Universal Design for Learning guidelines. National Center on Universal Design for Learning, 2018. Disponível em: https://udlguidelines.cast.org/. Acesso em: 05 set. 2024.

CHEN, Bodong; ZHU, Xiran; DEL CASTILLO, Fernando Díaz H. Integrating generative AI in knowledge building. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, v. 5, 100184, 2023. Disponível em: https://doi.org/10.1016/j. caeai.2023.100184. Acesso em: 06 set. 2024. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2023.100184

CHRISTIAN, Brian. The alignment problem: Machine learning and human values. New York: W. W. Norton, 2020.

COPE, Bill; KALANTZIS, Mary. Creating a different kind of learning management system: The CGScholar experiment. In: MONTEBELLO, Matthew. (Ed.). Promoting next-generation learning environments through CGScholar. New York: IGI Global, 2023. p. 1–18. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-6684-5124-3.ch001

COPE, Bill; KALANTZIS, Mary. On cyber-social learning: A critique of artificial intelligence in education. In: KOURKOULOU, Dora; TZIRIDES, Anastasia-Olga (Olnancy); COPE, Bill; KALANTZIS, Mary (Eds.). Trust and inclusion in AI-mediated education: Where human learning meets learning machines. London: Springer, 2024. p. 3–34. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-64487-0_1

COPE, Bill; KALANTZIS, Mary; ZAPATA, Gabriela C. Language learning after generative AI. In: ZAPATA, Gabriela C. (Ed.). Generative AI technologies, multiliteracies, and language education. New York: Routledge, 2025. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003531685-2

CRAWFORD, Kate. Atlas of AI: Power, Politics, and the Planetary Costs of Artificial Intelligence. Yale: Yale University Press, 2021. CRESWELL, John W. Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches. 4th Edition. London: SAGE Publications, 2013.

DEMBSEY, J. M. Closing the Grammarly gaps: A study of claims and feedback from an online grammar program. The Writing Center Journal, 36(1), p. 63–100, 2017. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7771/2832-9414.1815

GODWIN-JONES, Robert. Partnering with AI: Intelligent writing assistance and instructed language learning. Language Learning & Technology, 26(2), p. 5–24, 2022. Disponível em: http://doi.org/10125/73474. Acesso em: 04 set. 2024. DOI: https://doi.org/10.64152/10125/73474

GURAJALA, Swathi. Maximizing the Utility of Online Assessment Tools in the Pandemic Era: A Narrative Review. Journal of Education Technology in Health Sciences, 7(3), p. 80-85, 2020. Disponível em: https://doi.org/https://doi. org/10.18231/j.jeths.2020.020. Acesso em: 10 set. 2024. DOI: https://doi.org/10.18231/j.jeths.2020.020

GHUFRON, M. Ali. Exploring an automated feedback program ‘Grammarly’ and teacher corrective feedback in EFL writing assessment: Modern vs. traditional assessment [Paper presentation]. The 3rd English Language and Literature International Conference, Semarang, Indonesia., abril de 2019. Disponível em: https://doi.org/10.4108/eai.27-42019.2285308. Acesso em: 12 out. 2024. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4108/eai.27-4-2019.2285308

HATTIE, John; YATES, Gregory C. R. Visible Learning and the Science of How We Learn. New York: Routledge, 2014. HATTIE, John. Visible Learning: A Synthesis of Over 800 Meta-Analyses Relating to Achievement. New York: Routledge. 2009. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315885025

INSTITUTO NACIONAL DE ESTUDOS E PESQUISAS EDUCACIONAIS ANÍSIO TEIXEIRA (Inep). Desempenho em língua portuguesa é desafio para próximos anos. 5 de maio de 2023. Disponível em: https://www.gov. br/inep/pt-br/assuntos/noticias/saeb/desempenho-em-lingua-portuguesa-e-desafio-para-proximos-anos. Acesso em: 05 out. 2024.

ILLINOIS STATE BOARD OF EDUCATION. (2023). Illinois Report Card. Disponível em: https://www.illinoisreportcard.com/. Acesso em: 03 out. 2024.

ISRAEL, Maya; MAYNARD, Kathie; WILLIAMSON, Pamela. Promoting Literacy-embedded Authentic STEM Instruction for Students with Disabilities and Other Struggling Learners. Teaching Exceptional Children, 45(4), 18-25, 2013. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/004005991304500402

ISRAEL, Maya; WANG, Shuai; MARINO, Matthew T. A Multilevel Analysis of Diverse Learners Playing Life Science Video Games: Interactions between Gaming Content, Learning Disability Status, Reading Proficiency, and Gender. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, Advanced online publication, 2015. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21273

KAY, Judy; KLEITMAN, Sabina; AZEVEDO, Roger. Empowering Teachers to Design Learning Resources with Metacognitive Interface Elements. In: LUCKIN, Rosemary; PUNTAMBEKAR, Sadhana; GOODYEAR, Peter; GRABOWSKI, Barbara L.; UNDERWOOD, Joshua; WINTERS, Niall. (Eds.), Handbook of Design in Educational Technology. New York: Routledge, 2013.

KINGSTON, Neal; NASH, Brooke. Formative Assessment: A Meta-analysis and a Call for Research. Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 30(4), p. 28-37, 2011. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-3992.2011.00220.x

KNOCH, Ute. Rating scales for diagnostic assessment of writing: What should they look like and where should the criteria come from? Assessing Writing, 16(2), p. 81–96, 2011. Disponível em: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asw.2011.02.003. Acesso em: 10 de out. 2024. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asw.2011.02.003

LADSON-BILLINGS, Gloria. “#Literate Lives Matter”: Black Reading, Writing, Speaking, and Listening in the 21st Century. Literacy Research: Theory, Method, and Practice, 65, p. 141-151, 2016. Disponível em: https://doi.org/https:// doi.org/10.1177/2381336916661526. Acesso em: 10 abr. 2018. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/2381336916661526

LUKE, Allan. Critical Literacy, Schooling, and Social Justice: The Selected Works of Allan Luke. New York: Routledge, 2018. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315100951

MARINO, Marino T.; GOTCH, Chad M.; ISRAEL, Maya; VASQUEZ, Eleazar.; BASHAM, James D; BECHT, Kathleen. UDL in the middle school science classroom: Can video games and alternate text heighten engagement and learning for students with learning disabilities? Learning Disabilities Quarterly, 37(2), p. 87–99, 2014. Disponível em: https://doi. org/10.1177/0731948713503963. Acesso em: 20 nov. 2016. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0731948713503963

MCCARTHY, John; MINSKY, Marvin L.; ROCHESTER, Nathaniel; SHANNON, Claude E. A proposal for the Dartmouth Summer Research Project on Artificial Intelligence. 1955. Disponível em: https://www-formal.stanford.edu/jmc/history/ dartmouth/dartmouth.html. Acesso em: 24 ago. 2024.

MOLLICK, Ethan R.; MOLLICK, Lilach. Assigning AI: Seven approaches for students, with prompts. The Wharton School Research Paper. New York: SSRN, 2023. Disponível em: https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.447599. Acesso em: 19 ago. 2024. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4475995

MAHANAN, Mangai Solomon; TALIB, Corrienna Abdul; IBRAHIM, Nor Hasniza. Online formative assessment in higher STEM education: A systematic literature review. Asian Journal of Assessment in Teaching and Learning, 11(1), p. 47–62, 2021. Disponível em: https://doi.org/10.37134/ajatel.vol11.1.5.2021. Acesso em: 12 ago. 2023. DOI: https://doi.org/10.37134/ajatel.vol11.1.5.2021

MARTIN, Robert Cecil. Agile Software Development, Principles, Patterns, and Practices. New Jersey: Prentice Hall, 2009. NATIONAL CENTER FOR EDUCATION STATISTICS. Technical summary of preliminary analyses of NAEP 2017 writing assessments. 2019. Disponível em: https://nces.ed.gov/nationsreportcard/subject/writing/pdf/2017_writing_technical_summary.pdf. Acesso em: 10 jan. 2020.

NATIONAL COMMISSION ON WRITING. The neglected “R”: The need for a writing revolution. National Commission on Writing in America’s Schools and Colleges. 2003.

NATIONAL COMMISSION ON WRITING. Writing: A ticket to work ... or a ticket out - A survey of business leaders. National Commission on Writing. 2004. OGURLU, Uzeyir; MOSSHOLDER, Jesse. The perception of ChatGPT among educators: Preliminary findings. Research in Social Sciences and Technology, 8(1), p. 196–215, 2023. Disponível em: https://doi.org/10.46303/ressat.2023.39. Acesso em: 25 jan. 2024. DOI: https://doi.org/10.46303/ressat.2023.39

PAIVA, Vera Lúcia Menezes de Oliveira. Manual de Pesquisa em Estudos Linguísticos. São Paulo: Parábola, 2019. PETERS, Michael A.; JACKSON, Liz; PAPASTEPHANOU, Marianna; JANDRIĆ, Petar; LAZAROIU, George; EVERS, Colin W.; COPE, Bill; KALANTZIS, Mary; ARAYA, Daniel; TESAR, Marek; MIKA, Carl; CHEN, Lei; WANG, Chengbing; STURM, S.; RIDER, Sharon.; FULLER, Steve. AI and the future of humanity: ChatGPT-4, philosophy and education – Critical responses. Educational Philosophy and Theory, v. 56, n.9, 828-862, 2023. Disponível em: https://doi.org/1 0.1080/00131857.2023.2213437. Acesso em: 22 out. 2024. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00131857.2023.2213437

RANDALL, Jennifer. ‘Color-neutral’ is not a thing: Redefining construct definition and representation through a justice-oriented critical antiracist lens. Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 40(4), p. 82–90, 2021. SAEED, Sultan. Evaluating the Effectiveness of AI Tools in Enhancing Writing Skills: Perspectives from Writing Centers. ResearchGate, 2024. Disponível em: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/383263687. Acesso em: 06 jan. 2025. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/emip.12429

SHAHVAROUGHI FARAHANI, Milad; GHASEMI, Ghazal. How AI Changes the Game in Finance Business Models. International Journal of Innovation in Management, Economics and Social Sciences, 4(1), p. 35–46, 2024. Disponível em: https://doi.org/10.59615/ijimes.4.1.35. Acesso em: 03 jan. 2025. DOI: https://doi.org/10.59615/ijimes.4.1.35

SHEPARD, Lorrie A. Formative assessment: Caveat emptor. Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 28(3), p. 32–37, 2010. SHOR, Ira. Critical Pedagogy Is Too Big to Fail. Journal of Basic Writing (CUNY), 28 (2), p. 6-27, Fall, 2009. DOI: https://doi.org/10.37514/JBW-J.2009.28.2.02

STOBER, Thomas; HANSMANN, Uwe. Agile software development: Best practices for large software development projects. London: Springer, 2009. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-70832-2

TURING, Alan Mathison. Intelligent machinery. A Report to the National Physical Laboratory, 1948. UYGUN, Derya. Teachers’ perspectives on artificial intelligence in education. Advances in Mobile Learning Educational Research, 4(1), p. 931–939, 2024. Disponível em: https://doi.org/10.25082/AMLER.2024.01.005. Acesso em: 10 jan. 2025. DOI: https://doi.org/10.25082/AMLER.2024.01.005

WILIAM, Dylan. Embedded Formative Assessment. Indiana: Solution Tree Press, 2011.

WINNE, Philip H.; BAKER, Ryan S. The potentials of educational data mining for researching metacognition, motivation, and self-regulated learning. Journal of Educational Data Mining, 5(1), p. 1–8, 2013.